
InsuredAudit turns utilization management from a defensibility liability into a documented asset -- and gives members a plain-English, government-rule-anchored answer to every denial. Accountability, auditability, and transparency, by design.
Improper-denial scrutiny, appeals-overturn rates, and CMS / state audits all turn on one question: can you show, decision by decision, that the right criteria were applied consistently? When that record lives in scattered notes and reviewer memory, every appeal and audit is a risk the plan carries alone -- and every member is left without an answer.
The CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule (CMS-0057-F) phases in for impacted payers, including Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and CHIP managed care, and ACA exchange plans, through 2026 and 2027. It requires a specific reason for every prior-authorization denial, shorter decision windows, and public reporting of approval, denial, and turnaround metrics. Appeals, state fair hearings, and external quality review will test each of those numbers. InsuredAudit gives you the decision-level record behind each one.
Every authorization, concurrent review, and denial is bound to the exact clinical criteria applied -- explicit and reproducible on demand.
Each decision produces a tamper-evident, signed evidence record designed to support appeal, audit, and litigation review.
Find the denials your own criteria do not support before a member, an ombudsman, a fair-hearing officer, or a plaintiff does. InsuredAudit flags determinations that conflict with the criteria you applied, so you correct them upstream, cut avoidable overturns, and keep a sealed record for every denial you uphold. Members get a plain-language explanation of every decision.
AI drafts and surfaces; deterministic rules, the applied criteria, and qualified reviewers decide, so every determination is reproducible and explainable. Admissibility depends on applicable law and procedure.
Not a log viewer: a second check on every denial, against the plan's own published criteria.
Cut overturns, rework, and audit exposure by closing the gap between the decision and its documentation.
Walk into any audit or appeal able to reconstruct exactly why a decision was made, on the criteria, every time.
Members get a real answer instead of a form letter -- reducing abrasion, complaints, and regulatory friction.
Replace "we believe our process is sound" with a record you can produce, page for page, on demand.
What a pilot looks like, on your own historical determinations, before any commitment:
Book a health-plan briefing at insuredaudit.com/connect.